𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Benefits and costs, an eternal balance

✍ Scribed by Adrian K. Dixon


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
50 KB
Volume
37
Category
Article
ISSN
0146-6453

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Computed tomography (CT) technology has changed considerably in recent years with the introduction of increasing numbers of multiple detector arrays. There are several parameters specific to multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners that increase or decrease patient dose systematically compared to older single detector computed tomography (SDCT) scanners. This document briefly reviews the MDCT technology, radiation dose in MDCT, including differences from SDCT and factors that affect dose, radiation risks, and the responsibilities for patient dose management. The document recommends that users need to understand the relationship between patient dose and image quality and be aware that image quality in CT is often higher than that necessary for diagnostic confidence. Automatic exposure control (AEC) does not totally free the operator from selection of scan parameters, and awareness of individual systems is important. Scanning protocols cannot simply be transferred between scanners from different manufacturers and should be determined for each MDCT. If the image quality is appropriately specified by the user, and suited to the clinical task, there will be a reduction in patient dose for most patients. Understanding of some parameters is not intuitive and the selection of image quality parameter values in AEC systems is not straightforward. Examples of some clinical situation shave been included to demonstrate dose management, e.g. CT examinations of the chest, the heart for coronary calcium quantification and non-invasive coronary angiography, colonography, the urinary tract, children, pregnant patients, trauma cases, and CT guided interventions. CT is increasingly being used to replace conventional x-ray studies and it is important that patient dose is given careful consideration, particularly with repeated or multiple examinations.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Benefits and costs of newer drugs: an up
✍ Frank R. Lichtenberg πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 137 KB

## Abstract In previous work, we found strong evidence to support the hypothesis that the replacement of older drugs by new drugs resulted in reductions in total medical expenditures. In this study, we update and extend our previous study of the effect of drug ageβ€”years since FDA approvalβ€”on total

Airbag and facebag benefits and costs
✍ B.N. Fildes; M.H. Cameron; A.P. Vulcan; K.H. Digges; D. Taylor πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 956 KB

There is debate about the appropriate design of supplementary airbags for passenger car occupants with high levels of seatbelt use. A theoretical analysis was performed to demonstrate the likely costs and benefits of U.S. fullsize driver airbags and the smaller European-style facebag. This study, un