The use of aorto-coronary graft markers has not been standard, presumably due to concern about possible adverse effects on subsequent graft patency. Our goal was to determine if there was any increased risk of graft occlusion in patients who received circumferential graft markers at the time of thei
Beneficial impact of aorto-coronary graft markers on post-operative angiography
โ Scribed by Eisenhauer, MAJ Michael D. ;Collier, MAJ H. Edward ;Eisenhauer, LTjg Tracy L. ;Cambier, MAJ Patrick A.
- Book ID
- 101241323
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 200 KB
- Volume
- 40
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0098-6569
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Objective: When coronary and graft angiography is required for patients with prior coronary artery bypass (CAB) graft surgery, it is often difficult to localize the proximal aorto-coronary graft anastamosis. Our goal was to quantify the potential benefit during subsequent angiography if the proximal anastamosis is marked by an aorto-coronary graft marker at the time of CAB.
Methods: Retrospective review of 414 angiograms that were performed for patients with prior CAB. Cohorts with and without graft markers were compared.
Results: In the group with aorto-coronary graft markers and H2 aorto-coronary grafts, there were significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (30.5%, pF0.0001), contrast volume (21.7%, pF0.0001), and numbers of angiographic catheters used (17.0%, p50.0001). If only one aorto-coronary graft was placed and marked, a trend toward reduced fluoroscopy time was observed (23.8%, p50.07).
Conclusions: This study demonstrates the objective benefit supporting routine placement of circumferential aorto-coronary graft markers during CAB, particularly if G1 graft is required.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Publish with Bio Med Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge "BioMed Central will be the most significant development for disseminating the results of biomedical researc h in our lifetime.