𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Behavioral effects of enrichment on pair-housed juvenile rhesus monkeys

✍ Scribed by Steven J. Schapiro; Mollie A. Bloomsmith


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
863 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
0275-2565

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Among captive primates, inanimate environmental enrichment can lead to measurable changes in behavior indicative of an improvement in psychological well‐being. Although this has been demonstrated repeatedly for singly caged primates, the relationship is not as well studied for pairhoused animals. Study of the pair‐housed setting has become increasingly relevant because of the social housing mandate of the Animal Welfare Act regulations. We therefore observed 68 juvenile rhesus monkeys born in 1988 and 1989 and living in mixed‐sex pairs from the ages of 2 to 3 years. All pairs were compatible. Half of the pairs received two types of enrichment, while the remaining pairs served as controls. Enriched and control juvenile subjects differed in the amount of time that they spent being inactive, playing, and drinking, but did not differ in the amount of time they spent interacting with their partner. Grooming and play were the two most common socially directed activities in both groups, a species‐appropriate pattern. Males played more and vocalized less than did females. Overall, enriched and control subjects spent equivalent amounts of time located within a social distance of one another, but there was some difference between groups in allocation of behaviors while near the pairmate. Environmental enhancers were frequently utilized, and led to relatively small changes in behavior between control and enriched subjects, suggesting that the presence of a partner for juvenile rhesus monkeys acts as a form of enrichment that may dilute the effects of inanimate environmental enhancements. Β© 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effects of social and inanimate enrichme
✍ Steven J. Schapiro; Mollie A. Bloomsmith; Scott A. Suarez; Leila M. Porter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 1004 KB

Certain types of inanimate environmental enrichment have been shown to positively affect the behavior of laboratory primates, as has housing them in appropriate social conditions. While social housing is generally advocated as an important environmental enhancement, few studies have attempted to mea

Effects of puzzle feeders on pathologica
✍ M. A. Novak; J. H. Kinsey; M. J. Jorgensen; T. J. Hazen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 155 KB

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) occurs in about 10% of individually housed monkeys. Monkeys with SIB bite their own bodies frequently, occasionally inflicting wounds as a result. At present, there is no standard treatment for this phenomenon. We examined the effectiveness of puzzle feeders in alleviat

Behavioral responses of unrelated rhesus
✍ Viktor Reinhardt; Dan Houser; Stephen Eisele; Douglas Cowley; Russell Vertein πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 414 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

An attempt was made to socialize unrelated and unfamiliar adult rhesus monkey females that had lived in single cages for more than one year. Partners first were given the opportunity for noncontact familiarization in paqtitioned double cages. They were then transferred into an ordinary dodble cage.

Behavioral responses of unrelated adult
✍ Viktor Reinhardt πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 399 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

An attempt was made to pair ten unrelated, adult male rhesus monkeys that had been kept in single cages for several years. Potential companions were first given the opportunity to establish clear-cut rank relationships (unidirectional fear-grinning andlor withdrawing) during a 5-day period of noncon

Sneaky Monkeys: An Audience Effect of Ma
✍ A.M. OVERDUIN-DE VRIES; J.J.M. MASSEN; B.M. SPRUIJT; E.H.M. STERCK πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2012 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 628 KB

Males and females have different sexual interests and subsequently may show conflicting sexual strategies. While dominant males try to monopolize females, promiscuity benefits females and subordinate males. One way to escape monopolization by dominant males is to copulate in their absence. We tested