๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Before Civilization

โœ Scribed by Colin Renfrew


Publisher
Vintage Digital
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Leaves
320
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The refinement of radiocarbon dating using the information form tree-ring counts has raised serious doubts about the accepted theoretical frameowkr of European prehistory. Monuments in Central and Western Europe have proved to be considerably older than their supposed Near-Eastern forerunners, and the record must be almost completely rewritten in the light of these new dates. Before Civilsation is a preliminary attempt to do this with the help of analogies from more recent and well-documented primitive societies. The more glaring inconsistencies in the old theory are re-examined and Professor Renfrew shows convincingly how the baffling monuments of prehistoric Europe, like Stonehenge, could have been built without recourse to help from the 'more civilized' Near East.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


War Before Civilization
โœ Lawrence H. Keeley ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press, USA ๐ŸŒ English

The myth of the peace-loving "noble savage" is persistent and pernicious. Indeed, for the last fifty years, most popular and scholarly works have agreed that prehistoric warfare was rare, harmless, unimportant, and, like smallpox, a disease of civilized societies alone. Prehistoric warfare, accordin

War Before Civilization
โœ Lawrence H. Keeley ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press, USA ๐ŸŒ English

The myth of the peace-loving "noble savage" is persistent and pernicious. Indeed, for the last fifty years, most popular and scholarly works have agreed that prehistoric warfare was rare, harmless, unimportant, and, like smallpox, a disease of civilized societies alone. Prehistoric warfare, accordin

Civil Society Before Democracy
โœ Nancy Bermeo, Philip Nord ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Rowman & Littlefield ๐ŸŒ English

Bringing together historians and political scientists, this unique collaboration compares nineteenth-century civil societies that failed to develop lasting democracies with civil societies that succeeded. Much of the current literature on the connection between civil society and consolidating democr