𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Bayesian variable and model selection methods for genetic association studies

✍ Scribed by Brooke L. Fridley


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
274 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Variable selection is growing in importance with the advent of high throughput genotyping methods requiring analysis of hundreds to thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the increased interest in using these genetic studies to better understand common, complex diseases. Up to now, the standard approach has been to analyze the genotypes for each SNP individually to look for an association with a disease. Alternatively, combinations of SNPs or haplotypes are analyzed for association. Another added complication in studying complex diseases or phenotypes is that genetic risk for the disease is often due to multiple SNPs in various locations on the chromosome with small individual effects that may have a collectively large effect on the phenotype. Hence, multi‐locus SNP models, as opposed to single SNP models, may better capture the true underlying genotypic‐phenotypic relationship. Thus, innovative methods for determining which SNPs to include in the model are needed. The goal of this article is to describe several methods currently available for variable and model selection using Bayesian approaches and to illustrate their application for genetic association studies using both real and simulated candidate gene data for a complex disease. In particular, Bayesian model averaging (BMA), stochastic search variable selection (SSVS), and Bayesian variable selection (BVS) using a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for candidate gene association studies are illustrated using a study of age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) and simulated data. Genet. Epidemiol. 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Bayesian toolkit for genetic associati
✍ David J. Lunn; John C. Whittaker; Nicky Best 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 301 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract We present a range of modelling components designed to facilitate Bayesian analysis of genetic‐association‐study data. A key feature of our approach is the ability to combine different submodels together, almost arbitrarily, for dealing with the complexities of real data. In particular,

Bayesian semiparametric meta-analysis fo
✍ Maria De Iorio; Paul J. Newcombe; Ioanna Tachmazidou; Claudio J. Verzilli; John 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 142 KB 👁 1 views

We present a Bayesian semiparametric model for the meta-analysis of candidate gene studies with a binary outcome. Such studies often report results from association tests for different, possibly study-specific and non-overlapping genetic markers in the same genetic region. Meta-analyses of the resul

A variance components factor model for g
✍ B.A.S. Nonyane; J.C. Whittaker 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 265 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Studies of gene‐trait associations for complex diseases often involve multiple traits that may vary by genotype groups or patterns. Such traits are usually manifestations of lower‐dimensional latent factors or disease syndromes. We illustrate the use of a variance components factor (VCF

A comparison of analytical methods for g
✍ Alison A. Motsinger-Reif; David M. Reif; Theresa J. Fanelli; Marylyn D. Ritchie 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 280 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The explosion of genetic information over the last decade presents an analytical challenge for genetic association studies. As the number of genetic variables examined per individual increases, both variable selection and statistical modeling tasks must be performed during analysis. Whi

A comparison of analytical methods for g
✍ Alison A. Motsinger-Reif; David M. Reif; Theresa J. Fanelli; Marylyn D. Ritchie 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB 👁 1 views

on page 771, in the middle of the right hand column, the numerator on the right side of the equation should be squared and should read as follows: E½n i :

Bayesian mixture models for the incorpor
✍ Brooke L. Fridley; Daniel Serie; Gregory Jenkins; Kristin White; William Bamlet; 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 476 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract In the last decade, numerous genome‐wide linkage and association studies of complex diseases have been completed. The critical question remains of how to best use this potentially valuable information to improve study design and statistical analysis in current and future genetic associa