๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Basic assumptions and comparison of three gravitropic response models

โœ Scribed by A. Stockus

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
271 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0273-1177

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

A Comparison of Three Basic Conjugate Di
A Comparison of Three Basic Conjugate Direction Methods
โœ C. G. Broyden; M. A. Boschetti ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 679 KB

In this paper three basic conjugate direction methods for solving non-symmetric linear systems are described and compared. All three have entirely different basic structures and, consequently, completely different characteristics. The motivation for this work is the comparative assessment of the met

Saving future lives. A comparison of thr
Saving future lives. A comparison of three discounting models
โœ John A. Cairns; Marjon M. Van Der Pol ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 86 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

This paper compares three models of intertemporal choice concerning saving future lives: the constant discounting model, the proportional discounting model and the hyperbolic discounting model. The three models were investigated using data collected from the general public. Since these data have a m