A panel of recognized experts in liver transplantation ready been developed for kidney, 3 heart, 4 and lung. 5 At the pathology, hepatology, and surgery was convened for Third Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology, a group of the purpose of developing a consensus document for the specialists in liver transplantation from North America, Eugrading of acute liver allograft rejection that is scientifirope, and Asia met for this purpose. cally correct, simple, and reproducible and clinically useful. Over a period of 6 months pertinent issues were DEFINITION OF ACUTE REJECTION discussed via electronic communication media and a consensus conference was held in Banff, Canada in the In general, organ allograft rejection can be defined as, ''an summer of 1995. Based on previously published data and immunological reaction to the presence of a foreign tissue or the combined experience of the group, the panel agreed organ, which has the potential to result in graft dysfunction on a common nomenclature and a set of histopathologiand failure.'' 2 This report is specifically concerned with acute cal criteria for the grading of acute liver allograft rejecrejection, recently defined by the international consensus tion, and a preferred method of reporting. Adoption of document on terminology for hepatic allograft rejection 2 as, this internationally accepted, common grading system ''inflammation of the allograft, elicited by a genetic disparity by scientific journals will minimize the problems associbetween the donor and recipient, primarily affecting interlobated with the use of multiple different local systems. ular bile ducts and vascular endothelia, including portal Modifications of this working document to incorporate veins and hepatic venules and occasionally the hepatic artery chronic rejection are expected in the future. (HEPATOLand its branches.'' 2 Early rejection, cellular rejection, nonduc-OGY 1997;25:658-663.) topenic rejection, rejection without duct loss, and reversible rejection are synonyms for acute rejection that appear in the literature, but their use is discouraged. The general clinical, The success of hepatic transplantation has resulted in its laboratory, and histopathological abnormalities listed below widespread use for treatment of many patients with endstage were derived from the international consensus document. 2 liver disease; it is currently offered by more than 100 centers worldwide. One-year survival rates range from 70% to 90%;
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY FINDINGS
Abbreviations: RFH, Royal Free Hospital; RAI, rejection activity index. a transient acute rejection crisis. [6][7][8][9] Thus, it should be under-From the Department of Pathology-Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsstood that the histopathological diagnosis of acute rejection