𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Background suppression using magnetization preparation for contrast-enhanced MR projection angiography

✍ Scribed by Clemens Bos; Chris J.G. Bakker; Max A. Viergever


Book ID
102953494
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
587 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
0740-3194

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In contrast-enhanced MR projection angiography, vessel conspicuity is determined by the T(1)-weighted signal difference between blood and surrounding tissues. For slice-selective excitation pulses, the excitation angle varies across the slice, leading to poor saturation of the background signal at the slice edge and reducing the blood-background signal difference. This work reports on the use of magnetization preparation to enhance the T(1)-weighted contrast between blood and background tissue. Applying the prepulse nonselectively reduces the influence of the slice profile imperfections of the excitation pulse by keeping the background tissue at the slice edge saturated. Analytical calculations and in vitro experiments show that a prepulse angle of 110 degrees -130 degrees and a delay time of 20-25 ms enhance the contrast between contrast-enhanced blood (T(1) < 50 ms) and background tissues (T(1) > 200 ms), and improve the slice weighting profile. Magnetization preparation is shown to effectively suppress signal from background tissue, resulting in a threefold increase of the vessel-to-background signal ratio. Magnetization preparation eliminates the need for subtraction at the cost of a slight increase in scan time. Possible applications, such as projection MRA, detection of contrast arrival, and test-bolus tracking are demonstrated in a pig model. Magn Reson Med 46:78-87, 2001.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Need for background suppression in contr
✍ Tim Leiner; Thomas T. de Weert; Robbert J. Nijenhuis; G. Boudewijn C. Vasbinder; 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 418 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract To determine if background suppression is beneficial for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (pMRA), nonsubtracted, subtracted, and fat‐saturated contrast‐enhanced (CE) pMRA were compared in 10 patients with peripheral arterial disease. Signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast‐t

Contrast enhancement and artifact reduct
✍ R. Deichmann; F. Wiesmann; C. Hillenbrand; D. Hahn; A. Haase 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 176 KB

A method for the contrast enhancement and reduction of artifacts in three-dimensional (3D) magnetization-prepared (MP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequences is presented. A common artifact in these sequences is a periodical signal loss inside the vessels at the slab-slab junctions due to pr

Catheter-directed contrast-enhanced coro
✍ Jordin D. Green; Reed A. Omary; Brian E. Schirf; Richard Tang; Debiao Li 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 158 KB

## Abstract Contrast‐enhanced (CE) coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) following intraarterial (IA) injection of contrast agent was compared using two sequences in swine: magnetization‐prepared fast imaging with steady‐state precession (True‐FISP), and magnetization‐prepared fast low‐angl

View ordering for magnetization prepared
✍ Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D. Nguyen; Yi Wang 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 421 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Magnetization prepared segmented acquisition requires a view order that maximizes signal contrast during the acquisition of the central portion of __k__‐space. Steady state free precession (SSFP) acquisition further requires a view order that minimizes changes in phase‐encoding gradient

Coronary arteries at 3.0 T: Contrast-enh
✍ Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 911 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of contrast‐enhanced coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3.0 T. ## Materials and Methods Nine healthy human volunteers were studied on a 3.0‐T whole‐body MR system. A three‐dimensional, breathhold, magnetization‐prepared, segmented, gr

Contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic re
✍ Jiang Du; Timothy J. Carroll; Ethan Brodsky; Aiming Lu; T.M. Grist; Charles A. M 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 528 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To investigate the application of time‐resolved vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (VIPR) in contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the distal extremity (single station), and peripheral run‐off vasculature in the abdomen, thigh, and calf (th