Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast
✍ Scribed by Fritz Strack; Norbert Schwarz; Herbert Bless; Almut Kübler; Michaela Wänke
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 678 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In the present study, subjects had to generate an evaluative judgment about a target person on the basis of his behaviour that had both positive and negative implications. In a previous phase of the study that was ostensibly unrelated to the judgment task, the relevant trait categories were primed. Subsequently, half of the subjects were reminded of the priming episode. Consistent with earlier research (e.g. Lombardi, Higgins and Bargh, 1987; Newman and Uleman, 1990) that used memory of the priming events as a correlational measure, a contrast effect was found under the ‘reminding’ condition and assimilation resulted when subjects were not reminded of the priming episode. This pattern of results is interpreted as the consequence of corrective influences.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We extended existing research about self-construal activation to the study of social comparisons, speci®cally to self±other similarity ratings. Independent self-knowledge substantiates the notion of dissimilarity, whereas interdependent self-knowledge implies similarity with others. Therefore, perce
Two experiments demonstrate that thinking about a given politician may result in assimilation as well as contrast eects in evolutions of the politician's party. In two experiments, assimilation eects were observed when an experimental categorization task elicited the inclusion of a highly respected