Personal autonomy is often lauded as a key value in contemporary Western bioethics, and the claim that there is an important relationship between autonomy and rationality is often treated as an uncontroversial claim in this sphere. Yet, there is also considerable disagreement about how we should cas
Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics (Oxford Philosophical Monographs)
โ Scribed by Jonathan Pugh
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Year
- 2020
- Tongue
- English
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>Vagueness is the study of concepts that admit borderline cases: the property of being bald is vague because there are people who are neither definitely bald, nor definitely not bald. The epistemology of vagueness concerns the sorts of attitudes we ought to have towards propositions we know to
<span>Everyone agrees that discrimination can be a grave moral wrong. Yet this consensus masks fundamental disagreements about what makes something an act of discrimination, as well as precisely why (and hence when) such acts are wrong. In </span><span>Discrimination and Disrespect</span><span>, Ben
<span>Everyone agrees that discrimination can be a grave moral wrong. Yet this consensus masks fundamental disagreements about what makes something an act of discrimination, as well as precisely why (and hence when) such acts are wrong. In </span><span>Discrimination and Disrespect</span><span>, Ben
<span>Poellner, Peter</span>
<span>In this critical examination of recent accounts of the nature of science and of its justification given by Kuhn, Popper, Lakatos, Laudan, and Newton-Smith, Banner contends that models of scientific rationality which are used in criticism of religious beliefs are in fact often inadequate as<br>