๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics (Oxford Philosophical Monographs)

โœ Scribed by Jonathan Pugh


Publisher
Oxford University Press
Year
2020
Tongue
English
Edition
1
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary
โœ Pugh, Jonathan ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2020 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Personal autonomy is often lauded as a key value in contemporary Western bioethics, and the claim that there is an important relationship between autonomy and rationality is often treated as an uncontroversial claim in this sphere. Yet, there is also considerable disagreement about how we should cas

Vagueness and Thought (Oxford Philosophi
โœ Andrew Bacon ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<span>Vagueness is the study of concepts that admit borderline cases: the property of being bald is vague because there are people who are neither definitely bald, nor definitely not bald. The epistemology of vagueness concerns the sorts of attitudes we ought to have towards propositions we know to

Discrimination and Disrespect (Oxford Ph
โœ Benjamin Eidelson ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<span>Everyone agrees that discrimination can be a grave moral wrong. Yet this consensus masks fundamental disagreements about what makes something an act of discrimination, as well as precisely why (and hence when) such acts are wrong. In </span><span>Discrimination and Disrespect</span><span>, Ben

Discrimination and Disrespect (Oxford Ph
โœ Benjamin Eidelson ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2016 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<span>Everyone agrees that discrimination can be a grave moral wrong. Yet this consensus masks fundamental disagreements about what makes something an act of discrimination, as well as precisely why (and hence when) such acts are wrong. In </span><span>Discrimination and Disrespect</span><span>, Ben

The Justification of Science and the Rat
โœ Michael C. Banner ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<span>In this critical examination of recent accounts of the nature of science and of its justification given by Kuhn, Popper, Lakatos, Laudan, and Newton-Smith, Banner contends that models of scientific rationality which are used in criticism of religious beliefs are in fact often inadequate as<br>