## Abstract ## Purpose To describe and evaluate an automatic and unsupervised method for assessing the quantity and distribution of abdominal adipose tissue by MRI. ## Material and Methods A total of 20 patients underwent whole‐abdomen MRI. A total of 32 transverse T1‐weighted images were acquir
Automatic correction of intensity inhomogeneities improves unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI
✍ Scribed by Vincenzo Positano; Kenneth Cusi; Maria Filomena Santarelli; Annamaria Sironi; Roberta Petz; Ralph DeFronzo; Luigi Landini; Amalia Gastaldelli
- Book ID
- 102905000
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 637 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To demonstrate that unsupervised assessment of abdominal adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be improved by integrating automatic correction of signal inhomogeneities.
Materials and Methods
Twenty subjects (body mass index [BMI] 23.7–44.0 kg/m^2^) underwent abdominal (32 slices) MR imaging with a 1.9T Elscint Prestige scanner. Many images were affected by relevant intensity distortions. Unsupervised segmentation of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was performed by a previously validated algorithm exploiting standard fuzzy clustering segmentation. Images were also processed by an improved version of the software, including automatic correction of intensity inhomogeneities. To assess the effectiveness of the two methods SAT and VAT volumes were compared with manual analysis performed by a trained operator.
Results
Coefficient of variation between manual and unsupervised analysis was significantly improved by inhomogeneities correction in SAT evaluation. Systematic underestimation of SAT was also corrected. A less important performance improvement was found in VAT measurement.
Conclusion
The results of this study suggest that the compensation of signal inhomogeneities greatly improves the effectiveness of the unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat. Correction of intensity distortions is important in SAT evaluation and less significant in VAT measurement. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:403–410. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES