𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Automated acquisition of user preferences

✍ Scribed by L.Karl Branting; Patrick S. Broos


Book ID
102569127
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
339 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
1071-5819

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Decision support systems often require knowledge of users' preferences . However , preferences may vary among individual users or be dif ficult for users to articulate . This paper describes how user preferences can be acquired in the form of preference predicates by a learning apprentice system and proposes two new instance-based algorithms for preference predicate acquisition : 1 ARC and Compositional Instance -Based Learning (CIBL) . An empirical evaluation using simulated preference behavior indicated that the instance-based approaches are preferable to decision-tree induction and perceptrons as the learning component of a learning apprentice system , if representation of the relevant characteristics of problem-solving states , requires a large number of attributes , if attributes interact in a complex fashion , or if there are very few training instances . Conversely , decision-tree induction or perceptron learning is preferable if there are a small number of attributes and the attributes do not interact in a complex fashion unless there are very few training instances . When tested as the learning component of a learning apprentice system used by astronomers for scheduling astronomical observations , both CIBL and decision-tree induction rapidly achieved useful levels of accuracy in predicting the astronomers' preferences .


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Concepts of user centered automation
✍ Karl-Friedrich Kraiss; Nico Hamacher πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 142 KB
Automated pharmacokinetic analysis: Expe
✍ Peter G. Ruifrok πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1982 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 532 KB

## Abstract Two curve‐stripping and three nonlinear regression computer programs currently in use for automated pharmacokinetic analysis were tested alone and in combination on their suitability to solve a number of pharmacokinetic problems. The five programs, NONLIN, NONLINEAR, CFT3, ESTRIP, and R