are to be congratulated on their results for oesophageal resection (Br J Surg 1984; 71: 75C-1) and the honesty with which they are presented. I concur with their conclusion that in appropriate patients surgical resection should be the treatment of choice. Two points are worthy of note. The proporti
β¦ LIBER β¦
Authors' response: Reply from T. G. Brennan and J. Stewart
β Scribed by T. G. Brennan; J. Stewart
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 140 KB
- Volume
- 72
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0007-1323
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Authors' response: Reply from Professor
β
P. G. Collins; T. F. Gorey
π
Article
π
1985
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 232 KB
Authors' response: Reply from Mr G. Lync
β
G. Lynch; D. McAvinchey
π
Article
π
1985
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 136 KB
Authorsβ² response: Reply from Mr S. G. D
β
S. G. Darke
π
Article
π
1985
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 167 KB
Authors' response: Reply from Professor
β
T. P. J. Hennessy; R. P. O'Connell
π
Article
π
1985
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 112 KB
are to be congratulated on their results for oesophageal resection (Br J Surg 1984; 71: 75C-1) and the honesty with which they are presented. I concur with their conclusion that in appropriate patients surgical resection should be the treatment of choice. Two points are worthy of note. The proporti
Authorsβ² response: Reply from J. M. Dixo
β
J. M. Dixon; A. B. Lumsden
π
Article
π
1985
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 130 KB
Response of M. J. Heslop, G. Mason and A
β
M.J. Heslop; G. Mason; A. Provatas
π
Article
π
1995
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 166 KB