𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Authors' response: Reply from Mr P. J. Guillou et al.

✍ Scribed by P. J. Guillou; E. J. Will; A. M. Davison; G. R. Giles


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1985
Tongue
English
Weight
149 KB
Volume
72
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Resectability of an advanced gastric cancer depends, to a large extent, on the philosophy of the individual surgeon. We do not suggest that CT evidence of direct invasion of a single organ indicates unresectability. Our findings did, however, show that when the preoperative CT scan demonstrated a tumour of 2 8 cm size and evidence of invasion of three organs the tumour could not be resected.

We reiterate that we do not recommend CT for every patient with gastric cancer. Our use ofthis investigation is in poor risk surgical cases, without obstructive symptoms, in whom there is doubt as to the value of surgery. CT should be used in context with the clinical state of the patient. As with so many other investigations its value will depend on local experience and clinical policy.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Authorsβ€² response: Reply from C. J. Stod
✍ C. J. Stoddard; J. M. Simms πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1985 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 289 KB

## Correspondence management policy as described totally excludes endoscopic surveillance after the initial diagnosis is made and excludes anti-reflux surgery from the management programme in 84 per cent of cases, in whom less than half were over 70 years of age, and it is on these two points that