✦ LIBER ✦

Author's reply to the discussion by M. A. Benson of the paper, “A new approach to peak flow estimation”

✍ Scribed by Rangarajan, R.

Book ID: 119723404
Publisher: American Geophysical Union
Year: 1960
Tongue: English
Weight: 101 KB
Volume: 65
Category: Article
ISSN: 0148-0227
DOI: 10.1029/jz065i009p03021

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Discussion of paper by R. Rangarajan, “N

Discussion of paper by R. Rangarajan, “New approach to peak flow estimation”

✍ Benson, M. A. 📂 Article 📅 1960 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 79 KB

Author's reply to the preceding discussi

Author's reply to the preceding discussion [on “A new approach to peak flow estimation”]

✍ Rangarajan, R. 📂 Article 📅 1961 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

Discussion of paper by R. Rangarajan, “A

Discussion of paper by R. Rangarajan, “A new approach to peak flow estimation”

✍ Berman, Simeon M. 📂 Article 📅 1961 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 116 KB

Discussion of paper by R. Rangarajan, “A

Discussion of paper by R. Rangarajan, “A new approach to peak flow estimation”

✍ Ajwani, H. J. 📂 Article 📅 1961 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB

The author's reply to the discussion on

The author's reply to the discussion on Â¿A new approach to the design of pulse-monitored servo systemsÂ¿

✍ Stoneman, F.W. 📂 Article 📅 1950 🏛 Institution of Electrical Engineers ⚖ 322 KB

A reply to the discussion by A.M. Brandt

A reply to the discussion by A.M. Brandt of the paper “Young's modulus of concrete reconsidered”

✍ J.M. Torrenti; C. Boulay; C. Puch 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 73 KB

I appreciate the paper and results, but cannot agree with the authors that the results are basically different than those which I obtained many years ago and which were published in references 5,6, and 7. I have found that the values of strain in the central part of a compressed specimen were a bit