✦ LIBER ✦

Authors' reply to the comment of P. M. Mathias

✍ Scribed by K. Fotouh; K. Shukla

Book ID: 108311346
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1997
Tongue: English
Weight: 63 KB
Volume: 52
Category: Article
ISSN: 0009-2509
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(97)00029-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Author's reply to M. Zyczkowski's commen

Author's reply to M. Zyczkowski's comment

✍ D. J. Unger 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer Vienna 🌐 English ⚖ 59 KB

Authors' reply to comments by C.M. Crowe

✍ R.D. Skeirik; E.A. Grulke 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 206 KB

Authors' reply to comments by M.J. Houns

Authors' reply to comments by M.J. Hounslow

✍ Roger Y.-M. Lui; Robert W. Thompson 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB

Authors' reply to comments by P.N. Rowe

✍ J.F. Stubington 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 108 KB

Authors' reply to comments by P.N. Rowe

✍ M. Scia̧żko; J. Bandrowski 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 114 KB

Authors' reply to comments by R.P. Chhab

Authors' reply to comments by R.P. Chhabra

✍ Andrzej B. Jarzębski; Janusz J. Malinowski 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 181 KB

Fig. 1. Comparison between the results of Bhavaraju er al. (1978) and the theory of JM. seen to be excellent in the ranges 0.7 < n < 1 and 0 < r$ < 0.6. The two analyses, however, begin to diverge as the value of n drops below 0.7; which is anyway outside the range of applicability of the treatment