Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain

✍ Scribed by Jasim Al-Ajmi

• Publisher: Elsevier Science
• Year: 2009
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 229 KB
• Volume: 25
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0882-6110
• DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2009.02.005

✦ Synopsis

The aim of this research is to document the perceptions of credit and financial analysts with regard to the relationship between the effectiveness of audit committee, size of the auditing firm and audit quality in the context of Bahrain, which is characterized by a developed financial sector, low-liquidity stock market, low turnover in board of directors of listed firms, an inactive merger and acquisitions market and almost non-extent litigation. A survey of 300 credit and financial analysts shows that analysts considered auditors' opinion useful. Both credit and financial analysts see the credibility of financial statements to be a function of the size of the auditing firm. Both groups assume that the characteristics of Big-Four firms allow them to produce better-quality reports than non-Big firms. Non-audit services were found to affect auditor's independence and hence impair audit quality. Both the groups of analysts believe that effective audit committee enhances the quality of audit reports. Financial analysts perceive financial statements to be more credible than do credit analysts.