๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Atomic Charges Derived from Electrostatic Potentials for Molecular and Periodic Systems

โœ Scribed by Chen, De-Li; Stern, Abraham C.; Space, Brian; Johnson, J. Karl


Book ID
120993919
Publisher
American Chemical Society
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
286 KB
Volume
114
Category
Article
ISSN
1089-5639

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Atomic charges derived from electrostati
โœ Lisa Emily Chirlian; Michelle Miller Francl ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 864 KB

A new algorithm for fitting atomic charges to molecular electrostatic potentials is presented. This method is non-iterative and rapid compared to previous work. Results from a variety of gaussian basis sets, including STO-3G, 3-21G and 6-31G*, are presented. Charges for a representative collection o

Accurate molecular electrostatic potenti
โœ Marynick, Dennis S. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 197 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

A new approach for the calculation of electrostatic potential derived atomic charges is presented. Based on molecular orbital calculations in the PRDDOrM approximation, the new parametrized electrostatic potential ลฝ . PESP method is parametrized against ab initio MP2r6แސ31G\*\* calculations. For a da

Atomic charges derived from a fast and a
โœ Bingze Wang; George P. Ford ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 591 KB

## Abstract Atomic charges derived from a recently described approach to the very rapid computation of AM1 electrostatic potentials (ESP) accurately parallel, but are ca. 20% smaller than, the corresponding HF/6โ€31G\* values. The dipole moments computed from the AM1 charges are virtually identical

Comparison of methods for deriving atomi
โœ Sigfridsson, Emma; Ryde, Ulf ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 226 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Four methods for deriving partial atomic charges from the ลฝ quantum chemical electrostatic potential CHELP, CHELPG, Merz-Kollman, and . RESP have been compared and critically evaluated. It is shown the charges strongly depend on how and where the potential points are selected. Two alternative method