In this article, we suggest a framework for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTL) in association studies using structural equation modeling. Two tests to detect QTLs and estimate the proportion of variance they explain are discussed. The first test assumes that there is no population admixture a
Association studies for quantitative traits in structured populations
β Scribed by Silviu-Alin Bacanu; B. Devlin; Kathryn Roeder
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 86 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Association between disease and genetic polymorphisms often contributes critical information in our search for the genetic components of common diseases. Devlin and Roeder [1999: Biometrics 55:997β1004] introduced genomic control, a statistical method that overcomes a drawback to the use of populationβbased samples for tests of association, namely spurious associations induced by population structure. In essence, genomic control (GC) uses markers throughout the genome to adjust for any inflation in test statistics due to substructure. To date, genomic control (GC) has been developed for binary traits and biβ or multiallelic markers. Tests of association using GC have been limited to single genes. In this report, we generalize GC to quantitative traits (QT) and multilocus models. Using statistical analysis and simulations, we show that GC controls spurious associations in reasonable settings of population substructure for QT models, including geneβgene interaction. Through simulations, we explore GC power for both random and selected samples, assuming the QT locus tested is causal and its specific heritability is 2.5β5%. We find that GC, combined with either random or selected samples, has good power in this setting, and that more complex models induce smaller GC corrections. The latter suggests greater power can be achieved by specifying more complex genetic models, but this observation only follows when such models are largely correct and specified a priori. Genet. Epidemiol. 22:78β93, 2002. Β© 2002 WileyβLiss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Association mapping based on family studies can identify genes that influence complex human traits while providing protection against population stratification. Because no gene is likely to have a very large effect on a complex trait, most family studies have limited power. Among the co
## Abstract The optimal method for considering different genetic models in association studies is not clear. We compared analytical strategies that use different genetic models to analyze genotypeβphenotype information from association studies of quantitative traits in unrelated individuals. We cre
We applied sib-pair and association methods to a GAW data set of nuclear families with quantitative traits. Our approaches included 1) preliminary statistical studies including correlations and linear regressions, 2) sib-pair methods, and 3) association studies. We used a single data set to screen f
## Abstract Genomeβwide association studies of discrete traits generally use simple methods of analysis based on Ο^2^ tests for contingency tables or logistic regression, at least for an initial scan of the entire genome. Nevertheless, more power might be obtained by using various methods that anal
## Abstract The additional statistical power of association studies for quantitative traits was derived when ungenotyped relatives with phenotypes are included in the analysis. It was shown that the extra power is a simple function of the coefficient of additive genetic relationship and the phenoty