## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The biologic effect of continuing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma is unclear. The goal of rhe current study was to determine the short‐term effect of HRT withdrawal on invasive breast carcinoma using biologic surrogate markers of tu
Association of hormone replacement therapy to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in invasive breast carcinoma
✍ Scribed by Wendy Y. Chen; Susan E. Hankinson; Stuart J. Schnitt; Bernard A. Rosner; Michelle D. Holmes; Graham A. Colditz
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 132 KB
- Volume
- 101
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Observational studies and randomized trials have demonstrated that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) increases the recipient's risk of developing breast carcinoma. Because it is known that some breast malignancies are hormonally responsive and that others are not, it has been hypothesized that HRT may be associated with the development of estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive/progesterone receptor (PR)‐positive breast carcinoma more so than with the development of ER‐negative/PR‐negative breast carcinoma.
METHODS
The Nurses' Health Study is a prospective cohort study that enrolled 121,700 female registered nurses ages 30–55 years in 1976. In the current study, the authors analyzed 2548 malignancies that developed among eligible postmenopausal women in that cohort between 1980 and 2000 and for which data on ER and PR status were available.
RESULTS
Compared with women who had never used HRT, current long‐term users of HRT were more likely to develop ER‐positive/PR‐positive breast carcinoma (multivariate risk ratio [RR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52–2.12) but were not any more likely to develop ER‐negative/PR‐negative disease (multivariate RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72–1.39). This effect grew stronger with increasing duration of current HRT use and was also more pronounced among women with body mass index < 25 kg/m^2^. Furthermore, the association between HRT use and ER‐positive/PR‐positive disease was stronger among patients receiving combined HRT (CHRT) regimens, which included estrogen and progesterone, than among users of estrogen alone (ERT). In addition, tumors tended to develop more quickly in current users of CHRT than in ERT users.
CONCLUSIONS
The finding that current users of HRT were more likely to develop ER‐positive/PR‐positive tumors than they were to develop ER‐negative/PR‐negative ones suggests that both endogenous and exogenous hormonal factors may influence breast tumor characteristics. In analyses of the effects of hormonal factors on breast tumor development, ER‐positive/PR‐positive tumors and ER‐negative/PR‐negative tumors should be considered separately from each other Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This review presents our experience with the use of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) in the prediction of response to endocrine therapy in stage IV breast cancer. Presence of ER (>3 fmoUmg cytosol protein) significantly predicted response to the antiestrogen tamoxifen and to
## BACKGROUND. Premenopausal breast carcinoma patients who undergo tumor excision during the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle may have a significantly worse prognosis than those whose tumors are excised in other phases of the menstrual cycle. ## METHODS. Outcome was determined in a ser