𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Association between a glutathione S-transferase A1 promoter polymorphism and survival after breast cancer treatment

✍ Scribed by Carol Sweeney; Christine B. Ambrosone; Lija Joseph; Angie Stone; Laura F. Hutchins; Fred F. Kadlubar; Brian F. Coles


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
French
Weight
82 KB
Volume
103
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Glutathione S‐transferase (GST) enzymes detoxify chemotherapeutic drugs, and several studies have reported differences in survival for cancer patients who have variant genotypes for GSTP1, GSTM1 or GSTT1 enzymes. A recently described polymorphism alters hepatic expression of GSTA1, a GST with high activity in glutathione conjugation of metabolites of cyclophosphamide (CP). To consider the possible influence of the reduced‐expression GSTA1*B allele on cancer patient survival, we have conducted a pilot study of breast cancer patients treated with CP‐containing combination chemotherapy. GSTA1 genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. Kaplan‐Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate survival in relation to genotype. Among 245 subjects, 35% were GSTA1*A/*A, 49% GSTA1*A/*B and 16% GSTA1*B/*B; the genotype distribution did not differ by ethnic group, age or stage at diagnosis. Among patients who had 0 or 1 GSTA1*B allele, the proportion surviving at 5 years was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.59–0.72), whereas for GSTA1*B/*B subjects the proportion was higher, 0.86 (95% CI = 0.67–0.95). Significantly reduced hazard of death was observed for GSTA1*B/*B subjects during the first 5 years after diagnosis, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1–0.8. The association varied with time, with no survival difference observed for subjects who survived beyond 5 years. These results, although based on a small study population, describe an apparent difference in survival after treatment for breast cancer according to GSTA1 genotype. Further studies should consider the possible association between the novel GSTA1*B variant and outcomes of cancer therapy. Β© 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Identification of a DMBT1 polymorphism a
✍ Sandrine Tchatchou; Angela Riedel; Stefan Lyer; Julia Schmutzhard; Olga Strobel- πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 192 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

According to present estimations, the unfavorable combination of alleles with low penetrance but high prevalence in the population might account for the major part of hereditary breast cancer risk. Deleted in Malignant Brain Tumors 1 (DMBT1) has been proposed as a tumor suppressor for breast cancer

Isothiocyanates, glutathione S-transfera
✍ Kristin A. Moy; Jian-Min Yuan; Fung-Lung Chung; Xue-Li Wang; David Van Den Berg; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 117 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Isothiocyanates (ITC) in cruciferous vegetables may be chemopreventive against gastric cancer development. Glutathione __S__‐transferases (GSTs) may modify the chemopreventive effect of ITC. The relationship between urinary total ITC and risk of gastric cancer was prospectively examined

Common germline polymorphisms in COMT, C
✍ Miriam S. Udler; Elizabeth M. Azzato; Catherine S. Healey; Shahana Ahmed; Karen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 164 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Although preliminary evidence suggests that germline variation in genes involved in steroid hormone metabolism may alter breast cancer prognosis, this has not been systematically evaluated. We examined associations between germline polymorphisms in 6 genes involved in the steroid hormon

S20.4: Genetic Polymorphisms in CYP1A1 a
✍ Silke Kropp; Angela Risch; Birgit JΓ€ger; Helmut Bartsch; Jenny Chang-Claude πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 80 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Endogenous estrogen and tobacco smoke are putative risk factors for breast cancer. The genes CYP1A1 and 1B1 are involved in the metabolism of endogenous estrogen as well as of tobacco specific compounds. In a German population based case-control study of premenopausal breast cancer risk with 394 cas