𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Association and linkage with quantitative traits

✍ Scribed by Dr. Terri M. King; Dakai Zhu; Christopher I. Amos


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
313 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This paper examines two approaches for the analysis of quantitative traits: (1) association studies and (2) linkage studies. The trait studied was Q1 from simulated Problem 2 data set in Genetic Analysis Workshop 9. Our purpose was to evaluate associations present in the data, to identify nongenetic and genetic predictors of the trait, and to explore the simulated genome for linkage. Through the association study, we found evidence for the primary major gene associated with this trait. The linkage study found evidence of residual genetic effect acting through other traits. Adjustments of Q1 for 4 2 and 4 3 led to a failure to find significant effects of MG2 and MG3. This supports the suggestion that adjustment for genetically influenced traits for effects of other genetic traits can reduce the power to detect major gene effects. In summary, we detected the major gene directly associated with the trait of interest through association studies. Linkage analysis detected evidence for two other genes associated to a lesser degree with the trait. ' 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bivariate combined linkage and associati
✍ Jeesun Jung; Ming Zhong; Lian Liu; Ruzong Fan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 253 KB

## Abstract In this paper, bivariate/multivariate variance component models are proposed for high‐resolution combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL), based on combinations of pedigree and population data. Suppose that a quantitative trait locus is located in a chro

Power comparison of regression methods t
✍ Xiaofeng Zhu; Robert C. Elston πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 36 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

proposed a regression-based TDT method for quantitative traits consisting of regressing the trait on the parental transmission of a marker allele. Zhu and Elston [2000] also developed a TDT method for quantitative traits by defining a linear transformation to condition out founder information. Both

Quantitative trait linkage mapping in an
✍ Rogers, J.; Mahaney, M.C.; Almasy, L.; Comuzzie, A.G.; Blangero, J. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 185 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Recent years have seen rapid progress in several areas of both biomedical and anthropological genetics. While genetic analyses have come to play a significant role in biological anthropology, there has been little use of modern methods for linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). It is now

Multipoint oligogenic linkage analysis o
✍ John Blangero; Laura Almasy πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 42 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

We present an overview of pedigree-based variance component linkage methods and discuss their extension to oligogenic inheritance. As an example, oligogenic linkage analyses were performed using the quantitative trait Q4 from the GAW10 simulated data set. A strategy involving sequential oligogenic a

Bivariate quantitative trait linkage ana
✍ Laura Almasy; Thomas D. Dyer; John Blangero πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 40 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Power to detect linkage and localization of a major gene were compared in univariate and bivariate variance components linkage analysis of three related quantitative traits in general pedigrees. Although both methods demonstrated adequate power to detect loci of moderate effect, bivariate analysis i

Score test for detecting linkage to quan
✍ H. Putter; L.A. Sandkuijl; J.C. van Houwelingen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 119 KB

## Abstract The two most popular methods to detect linkage of a quantitative trait to a marker are the Haseman‐Elston regression method and the variance components likelihood‐ratio test. In the literature, these methods are frequently compared and the relative advantages and disadvantages of each m