𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay

✍ Scribed by Masahiro Takeyoshi; Shuji Noda; Shunsuke Yamazaki; Hiroshi Kakishima; Kanji Yamasaki; Ian Kimber


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
79 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0260-437X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis is a serious health problem. There is a need to identify and characterize skin sensitization hazards, particularly with respect to relative potency, so that accurate risk assessments can be developed. For these purposes the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was developed. Here, we have investigated further a modification of this assay, non‐radioisotopic LLNA, which in place of tritiated thymidine to measure lymph node cell proliferation employs incorporation of 5‐bromo‐2'‐deoxyuridine. Using this method we have examined the skin sensitizing activity of eugenol, a known human contact allergen, and its dimers 2,2'‐dihydroxyl‐3,3'‐dimethoxy‐5,5'‐diallyl‐biphenyl (DHEA) and 4,5'‐diallyl‐2'‐hydroxy‐2,3'‐dimethoxy phenyl ether (DHEB). Activity in the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) also measured. On the basis of GPMT assays, eugenol was classified as a mild skin sensitizer, DHEA as a weak skin sensitizer and DHEB as an extreme skin sensitizer. In the non‐radioisotopic LLNA all chemicals were found to give positive responses insofar as each was able to provoke a stimulation index (SI) of ≥3 at one or more test concentrations. The relative skin sensitizing potency of these chemicals was evaluated in the non‐radioisotopic LLNA by derivation of an ec~3~ value (the concentration of chemical required to provoke an SI of 3). The ec~3~ values calculated were 25.1% for eugenol, >30% for DHEA and 2.3% for DHEB. Collectively these data suggest that assessments of relative potency deriving from non‐radioisotopic LLNA responses correlate well with evaluations based on GPMT results. These investigations provide support for the proposal that the non‐radioisotopic LLNA may serve as an effective alternative to the GPMT where there is a need to avoid the use of radioisotopes. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Skin sensitization potency of isoeugenol
✍ Masahiro Takeyoshi; Kenji Iida; Keiko Suzuki; Shunsuke Yamazaki 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 153 KB

## Abstract Allergic contact dermatitis is the serious unwanted effect arising from the use of consumer products such as cosmetics. Isoeugenol is a fragrance chemical with spicy, carnation‐like scent, is used in many kinds of cosmetics and is a well‐known moderate human sensitizer. It was previousl

Assessment of the relative skin sensitiz
✍ E.L. Kostoryz; Q. Zhu; H. Zhao; M. Miller; J.D. Eick 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

## Abstract Siloranes are silicon and oxirane (epoxy) containing monomers used for new dental composite development. The siloranes 3,4‐epoxycyclohexylethyl‐cyclopolymethylsiloxane (Tet‐Sil) and bis‐3,4‐epoxycyclohexylethyl‐phenyl‐methylsilane (Ph‐Sil) have in common cycloaliphatic epoxy moieties. T

Novel approach for classifying chemicals
✍ Masahiro Takeyoshi; Kenji Iida; Keiji Shiraishi; Satsuki Hoshuyama 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 250 KB

## Abstract The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is currently recognized as a stand‐alone sensitization test for determining the sensitizing potential of chemicals, and it has the advantage of yielding a quantitative endpoint that can be used to predict the sensitization potency of chemicals. T

Advantage of using CBA/N strain mice in
✍ Masahiro Takeyoshi; Shuji Noda; Kanji Yamasaki; Ian Kimber 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is currently recognized as a stand-alone test method for determining the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. It has been incorporated into the official test guidelines published by some authorities, including the OECD. To avoid the use of radioisotopes,