Assessment of the patient-doctor interaction scale for measuring patient satisfaction
โ Scribed by Marjorie A. Bowman; Anne Herndon; Penny C. Sharp; Mark B. Dignan
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 588 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0738-3991
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This study assessed the validity, reliability and usability of the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale (PDIS) in a university-based family practice center. Health maintenance visits and problem visits were included, and data were collected at the time of the visit and again 1 month later. Three different methods of administration (in-person, telephone, and mail) were used to assess usability. Of 91 patients approached, 1 refused to participate. A total of 64 (70%) patients completed the instrument adequately to permit analysis. PDIS scores correlated with overall assessment of patient satisfaction (P < 0.01), suggesting criterion-based validity. Internal consistency (reliability) of the PDIS was indicated by Cronbach's alpha which were consistently greater than 0.80. Scores and return rates varied by method of administration, with the telephone method performing best. The PDIS appears to fulfill the requirements for a valid, reliable and useful instrument to assess patient satisfaction in family practice settings.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Objective: To test the hypothesis that 3 distinct domains of patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal care--satisfaction with the office environment, provider-patient interaction, and treatment outcomes--can be measured reliably and, when considered separately, are more valid indicators of sati
## Abstract Our review of 100 patients using the Camdex and Crichton assessment schedules shows that the severity of illness and degree of dependency are similar in day hospital and impatient assessment groups. The main predictors of allocation for inpatient assessment and eventual placement in lon
## Abstract ## Objective Collaboration with patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) highlights that outcomes important to them include fatigue, coping, and life enjoyment. However, these are not commonly measured in clinical trials. There is little evidence about which outcomes patients would prio