## Abstract ## Background and Objectives Precursor lesions of oesophagus adenocarcinoma constitute a clinical dilemma. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for this indication, but it is difficult to optimise without an appropriate animal model. For this reason, we assessed the she
Assessment of the ototoxicity of almond oil in a chinchilla animal model
β Scribed by Emilia Peleva; Stephanie Mourad; Dan Citra; Sam J. Daniel
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 993 KB
- Volume
- 121
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0023-852X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Objectives/Hypothesis: Almond oil is frequently prescribed as a ceruminolytic, to soften ear wax or relieve ventilation tube occlusion. Ceruminolytics could lead to ototoxicity in the presence of a tympanic perforation. Reports on the safety of almond oil as a ceruminolytic is limited. The present study aimed to assess the effect of ototopic almond oil on hearing.
Study Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a chinchilla animal model. Methods: Bilateral myringotomies were performed in 19 female chinchilla. One randomly selected ear received almond oil, whereas the other ear received saline applied transtympanically. Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing was performed prior to application and at 14 and 30 days following application. Postmortem Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images were obtained to assess cochlear hair cell status.
Results: At 30 days following application, there was no significant change in ABR thresholds at 16, 20, or 25 kHz. No cochlear hair cell loss was observed with SEM.
Conclusions: In the chinchilla, when a tympanic perforation is present, almond oil does not seem to cause ototoxicity. Further studies are needed to better assess the effect of almond oil on hearing in humans.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) research relies increasingly on small animal models and noninvasive imaging methods such as MRI, singleβphoton emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET). However, a direct comparison among these techniques for characte