𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Assessment of the molecular dynamics structure of DNA in solution based on calculated and observed NMR NOESY volumes and dihedral angles from scalar coupling constants

✍ Scribed by Haribabu Arthanari; Kevin J. McConnell; Richard Beger; Matthew A. Young; D. L. Beveridge; Philip H. Bolton


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
822 KB
Volume
68
Category
Article
ISSN
0006-3525

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

To assess the accuracy of the molecular dynamics (MD) models of nucleic acids, a detailed comparison between MD‐calculated and NMR‐observed indices of the dynamical structure of DNA in solution has been carried out. The specific focus of our comparison is the oligonucleotide duplex, d(CGCGAATTCGCG)~2~, for which considerable structural data have been obtained from crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. An MD model for the structure of d(CGCGAATTCGCG)~2~ in solution, based on the AMBER force field, has been extended with a 14 ns trajectory. New NMR data for this sequence have been obtained in order to allow a detailed and critical comparison between the calculated and observed parameters. Observable two‐dimensional (2D) nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) volumes and scalar coupling constants were back‐calculated from the MD trajectory and compared with the corresponding NMR data. The comparison of these results indicate that the MD model is in generally good agreement with the NMR data, and shows closer accord with experiment than back‐calculations based on the crystal structure of d(CGCGAATTCGCG)~2~ or the canonical A or B forms of the sequence. The NMR parameters are not particularly sensitive to the known deficiency in the AMBER MD model, which is a tendency toward undertwisting of the double helix when the parm.94 force field is used. The MD results are also compared with a new determination of the solution structure of d(CGCGAATTCGCG)~2~ using NMR dipolar coupling data. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 68: 3–15, 2003