Assessment of quality of cod roes and relationship between quality and maturity stage
โ Scribed by Katsiadaki, Ioanna G; Taylor, K?D Anthony; Smith, Gillian
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 484 KB
- Volume
- 79
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5142
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Cod roe landings are subject to great variability regarding their quality and subsequent price for the food industry. A scheme was developed for the classiยฎcation of cod roe into four quality grades (A, B, C and D) based on appearance and texture attributes as described by cod roe traders. Evaluation of the maturity stage of 80 commercial cod ovaries through the frequency distribution of oocyte diameter and the percentage presence of empty follicular sacks revealed that cod ovaries with commercial value are at stage 4 (ripe or vitellogenic), stage 5 (spawning) and stage 6 (spent) of development. The designated maturity stages were found to be closely related to the described quality grades. This relationship implied that vitellogenic ovaries (stages 4a, 4b and 4c) were of A quality, early spawning ovaries (stage 5a) were most often classed as B quality, advanced and late spawning ovaries (stage 5b and 5c) were of C quality, whilst spent ovaries (stage 6) were of the lowest quality grade (D). Several physicochemical characteristics recorded (eg pH, membrane features) were also found to be related to the quality and the maturity stage of the ovaries. There is a signiยฎcant relationship between roe quality and moisture content, with roes of higher quality having a lower moisture content.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A stratified randomly selected sample of 28 of all elderly long-term care institutions in the Southampton district was studied including private and local authority residential homes, private nursing homes and NHS geriatric and psychogeriatric wards. The manager was interviewed with a 57-item qualit
The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or of the U.S. Government.
## BACKGROUND. The rise of managed care has increased interest in measuring, reporting, and improving quality of care. To date, quality assessment has relied on a leading indicator approach, which may miss important variations in care. The authors developed cancer specific indicators using a novel