Assessment of natural and synthetic wollastonite as source for bioceramics preparation
✍ Scribed by R. G. Carrodeguas; A. H. De Aza; P. N. De Aza; C. Baudín; J. Jiménez; A. López-Bravo; P. Pena; S. De Aza
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 723 KB
- Volume
- 83A
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1549-3296
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Pseudowollastonite ceramics (β‐CaSiO~3~) from synthetic and natural sources were assessed with regard to their properties relevant to biomedical applications. Synthetic and natural CaSiO~3~ powders, with average particle size of 1.6 and 13.2 μm, respectively, were first employed. Powders were pressed and sintered at 1400°C for 2 h. Pseudowollastonite was the only crystalline phase in sintered materials. Glassy phase, eight times more abundant in sintered natural wollastonite (SNW) than in the synthetic one (SSW), was observed in grain boundaries and in triple points. Larger grains and bigger and more abundant pores were present in SNW, resulting in lower diametral tensile strength (26 MPa), than in SSW (42 MPa). However, by milling the natural wollastonite starting powder to a particle size of 2.0 μm and sintering (SNW‐M), the microstructure became finer and less porous, and diametral tensile strength increased (48 MPa). Weibull modulus of SNW and SNW‐M samples was twice that of the SSW. All the samples released Si and Ca ions, and removed phosphate ions from simulated body fluid in similar amounts and were completely coated by apatite‐like spherules after soaking in simulated body fluid for 3 wk. The aqueous extracts from all samples studied were not cytotoxic in a culture of human fibroblastic cells. No differences in fibroblast‐like human cells adhesion and proliferation were observed between samples. According to the obtained results, properly processed pseudowollastonite bioceramics, obtained from the natural source, exhibit the same in vitro behavior and better performance in terms of strength and reliability than do the more expensive synthetic materials. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2007
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
On simple intelligibility measures, high-quality synthesiser output now scores almost as well as natural speech. Nevertheless, it is widely agreed that perception of synthetic speech is a harder task for listeners than perception of natural speech; in particular, it has been hypothesized that listen
chemical inertness (toward heat in inert atmospheres for Macro-and mesoporous carbon samples have been prepared example) and their ability to endure harsh chemical environfrom both natural and synthetic sources. These natural and synments (including highly acidic/basic and organic media), thetic car