Assessing women's empowerment: towards a conceptual framework
β Scribed by Sarah Mosedale
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 105 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0954-1748
- DOI
- 10.1002/jid.1212
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
When policymakers and practitioners decide that 'empowerment'-usually of women or the poor-is a development goal what do they mean? And how do they determine the extent to which it has been achieved? Despite empowerment having become a widely used term in this context there is no accepted method for measuring and tracking changes.
Presumably if we want to see people empowered we consider them to be currently disempowered i.e. disadvantaged by the way power relations presently shape their choices, opportunities and well-being. If this is what we mean then we would benefit from being better informed about the debates which have shaped and refined the concept of power and its operation.
Therefore in this paper, after briefly reviewing how the empowerment of women has been discussed within development studies, I look at how the concept of power was debated and refined during the second half of the twentieth century and discuss how power relations might be described and evaluated in a particular context. I then propose a conceptual framework within which empowerment might be assessed. Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
'Empowering' women has become a frequently cited goal of development interventions. However, while there is now a significant body of literature discussing how women's empowerment has been or might be evaluated, there are still major difficulties in so doing. Furthermore many projects and programmes which espouse the empowerment of women show little if any evidence of attempts even to define what this means in their own context
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We develop an information quality model based on a user-centric view adapted from Financial Accounting Standards Board, 1 Wang et al., 2 and Wang and Strong. 3 The model consists of four essential attributes (or assertions): accessibility, interpretability, relevance, and integrity. Four subattribut