The past 10 years have brought amazing changes to the technologies used to turn remotely sensed data into maps. As a result, the principles and practices necessary for assessing the accuracy of those maps have also evolved and matured. This third edition of Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed
Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Second Edition (Mapping Science)
✍ Scribed by Russell G. Congalton, Kass Green
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 210
- Series
- Mapping Science
- Edition
- 2
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Congalton does a great job presenting remote sensing accuracy assessment concepts. In addition to the theory, he provides practical examples to help in applying the theory to real world situations.
The book seems way over-priced for its size.
✦ Subjects
Науки о Земле;Метеорология и климатология;Методы обработки метеорологических данных;
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Explains principles and practical considerations of designing and conducting accuracy assessment, walking through steps of sample design, collecting data, building and testing the error matrix, and analyzing the results. An overview chapter discusses the history and basic concepts of accuracy assess
The role of an editor in an anthology such as this one is to ensure that chapters follow each other in a logical sequence, don't overlap and, in the end, provide information much like a text book would. This book does none of that. It reads more like a scientific journal composed of random papers.
The difficulties inherent in assessing the accuracy of large-area spatial data sets, their subsequent analysis by GIS, and their importance to landscape characterization make the development of methods for robust accuracy assessment a critical challenge. In December 2002, the U.S. EPA sponsored a sy
The development of robust accuracy assessment methods for the validation of spatial data represents a difficult challenge for the geospatial science community. Obstacles to robust assessments include continuous data characteristics and positional errors, demanding ongoing development by GIS and remo