Assessing state parity legislation
โ Scribed by Samuel H. Zuvekas
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 47 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1091-4358
- DOI
- 10.1002/mhp.101
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
The temptation is great, but premature, to conclude from the Sturm study that parity mandates had no effect on access and insurance coverage for the mentally ill. The study lacks statistical power for those directly covered by the mandates, and it is unlikely adequate power exists for those only indirectly affected. The inclusion of the uninsured, Medicaid enrollees, and privately covered individuals not subject to the mandates, and the imprecise outcome measures, increase the likelihood that other factors dominate parity. The timing of implementation in some states is also problematic. But Sturm asks the right questions and future waves of the Healthcare for Communities survey and other data will be better able to address them. Copyright ยฉ 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Treatment is highly cost-effective in reducing an individual's substance abuse (SA) and associated harms. However, data from Treatment Episodes (TEDS) indicate that per capita treatment admissions substantially lagged behind increases in heavy drug use from 1992 to 2007. Only 10% of individuals with