๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Assessing state parity legislation

โœ Scribed by Samuel H. Zuvekas


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
47 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
1091-4358

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

The temptation is great, but premature, to conclude from the Sturm study that parity mandates had no effect on access and insurance coverage for the mentally ill. The study lacks statistical power for those directly covered by the mandates, and it is unlikely adequate power exists for those only indirectly affected. The inclusion of the uninsured, Medicaid enrollees, and privately covered individuals not subject to the mandates, and the imprecise outcome measures, increase the likelihood that other factors dominate parity. The timing of implementation in some states is also problematic. But Sturm asks the right questions and future waves of the Healthcare for Communities survey and other data will be better able to address them. Copyright ยฉ 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


State Narcotic Legislation
โœ England, J.W. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1915 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier โš– 230 KB
Mental health parity legislation, cost-s
โœ Dhaval Dave; Swati Mukerjee ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 367 KB

Treatment is highly cost-effective in reducing an individual's substance abuse (SA) and associated harms. However, data from Treatment Episodes (TEDS) indicate that per capita treatment admissions substantially lagged behind increases in heavy drug use from 1992 to 2007. Only 10% of individuals with

Ground state parity of 227Ac
โœ G.R. Hagee; R.C. Lange; A.G. Barnett; A.R. Campbell; C.R. Cothern; D.F. Griffing ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1968 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 162 KB