Assessing digital libraries: Evaluation strategies, practices, and issues
β Scribed by John Carlo Bertot; Charles R. McClure; William E. Moen
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 106 KB
- Volume
- 41
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0044-7870
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
These libraries can include online databases, e-books, digitized collections, and services such as digital reference. The panel identifies evaluation strategies, methods, and issues that assist developers and researchers assess the extent to which such libraries meet stated goals and objectives and user information needs. In particular, the panel presents fmdings from studies conducted by the authors with the Florida Electronic Library and Library of Texas initiatives.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This session focuses on important issues in designing and implementing multilingual digital libraries. A group of experts who have both research and implementation experiences with multilingual digital libraries will join the panel to present and discuss: (1) the state of the art of sea
at Santa Barbara, and University of Michigan among the academic leaders in the U.S.). Annual digital library conferences are also held in the U.S., Asia, and Europe, and new journals devoted to digital library research and development have been established. D-Lib Magazine 1 was founded in 1995, and
## Abstract Usability, functionality, and accessibility testing of digital library information services and products are essential for providing high quality services to users. This paper details a longβterm, evolving effort to develop meaningful evaluations for assessing digital libraries. The aut
The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) is one of the six digital library projects funded by NSF, DARPA, and NASA. ADL's collection and services focus on information containing georeferences: maps, images, data sets, text, and other information sources with links to geographic locations. During this st
## Abstract Social scientists, natural scientists, and evaluators have not properly defined the concept of scale for environmental problems. Environmental scale generally differs from social scale, which confounds the challenge of evaluating policies and governance arrangements in addressing enviro