𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Aspiration biopsy cytology of occult breast lesions by use of the “scouting needle”. A prospective study of 261 cases

✍ Scribed by Gary S. Daum; Tilde S. Kline; Renee L. Artymyshyn; Hunter S. Neal


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
333 KB
Volume
67
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The increased use of mammography for the detection of impalpable breast lesions has resulted in a need for new diagnostic techniques. In a prospective study of 261 occult breast lesions, aspiration biopsy was done with a standard fine needle and syringe. This "scouting needle" technique permits the collection of diagnostic cytologic material in the clinician's office without specialized radiologic equipment. Thirty of 53 malignant lesions (57%) were detected cytologically. A benign cytologic diagnosis, which was made in 220 patients, did not preclude additional investigation. Aspiration biopsy using the "scouting needle" is a rapid, low-cost, easily performed, initial procedure which complements "watchful waiting." When diagnostic of carcinoma, it results in immediate surgical intervention and may obviate two-stage surgical treatment.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cytologic score and DNA-image analysis i
✍ Giorgio Gherardi; Cristina Marveggio 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 132 KB 👁 2 views

We prospectively evaluated the accuracy of the cytologic score system developed by Masood et al. combined with DNA-image analysis in the subclassification of 47 fine-needle aspiration samples with cytologic features of borderline breast lesions. Cytologic scores ranged between 12-18. All cases under

Can core needle biopsy replace fine-need
✍ Michael S. Ballo; Nour Sneige 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 404 KB 👁 2 views

BACKGROUND. There appears to be a growing movement in favor of core needle biopsy (CNB) over fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in detecting breast carcinoma in women. The authors compared the sensitivity and specificity of these two methods in patients who presented to The University of Texas M.