✦ LIBER ✦

Asian achievement, brain size, and evolution: Comments on A. H. Yee

✍ Scribed by J. Philippe Rushton

Book ID: 105499033
Publisher: Springer US
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 393 KB
Volume: 7
Category: Article
ISSN: 1040-726X
DOI: 10.1007/bf02212308

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Effect of Print Size on Achievement

The Effect of Print Size on Achievement in Mathematics Problem Solving

✍ William H. Nibbelink; Jean A. Gerig; Hiram D. Hoover 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 School Science and Mathematics Association 🌐 English ⚖ 288 KB

Positive selection on NIN, a gene involv

Positive selection on NIN, a gene involved in neurogenesis, and primate brain evolution

✍ S. H. Montgomery; N. I. Mundy 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 727 KB

Reply to “Comment on simulation of damag

Reply to “Comment on simulation of damage evolution in composites: A phase-field model, by H. Emmerich and D. Pilipenko”

✍ S.B. Biner; S.Y. Hu 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 131 KB

Reply to the comments on “Middle Cretace

Reply to the comments on “Middle Cretaceous back-arc formation and arc evolution along the Asian margin: the Shyok Suture Zone on northern Ladakh (NW Himalaya)” by Weinberg and Dunlap

✍ Y Rolland; A Pêcher 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 60 KB

Comments on `A comparison of optical mea

Comments on `A comparison of optical measurements of liquid water content and drop size distribution in adiabatic regions of Florida cumuli'

✍ H. Gerber 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 365 KB

Emergentist monism, biological realism,

Emergentist monism, biological realism, operations and brain–mind problem: Reply to comments on “Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space–time” by An.A. Fingelkurts, Al.A. Fingelkurts, C.F.H. Neves

✍ Andrew A. Fingelkurts; Alexander A. Fingelkurts; Carlos F.H. Neves 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 165 KB

We would like to thank all the commentators who responded to our target review paper for their thoughtprovoking ideas and for their initially positive characterization of our theorizing. Our position provoked a broad range of reactions, from enthusiastic support to some kind of opposition . Regard