<p><p>This monograph presents a method of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the standard circle and arrow approach with the Toulmin model. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, and a
Argument Structure:: Representation and Theory
β Scribed by James B. Freeman (auth.)
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 223
- Series
- Argumentation Library 18
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This monograph presents a method of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the standard circle and arrow approach with the Toulmin model. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, and a thorough discussion of the linked-convergent distinction follows. Discussion includes consideration of alternative understandings of argument structure and its representation presented in Wigmoreβs chart method, Pollockβs inference graphs, and the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. An account of the proper reconstruction of enthymemes and issues at the border of structural analysis versus evaluation of arguments conclude the book.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter....Pages i-xviii
An Approach to Argument Macrostructure....Pages 1-38
The Dialectical Nature of Argument....Pages 39-58
Toulminβs Problematic Notion of Warrant....Pages 59-88
The Linked-Convergent DistinctionβA First Approximation....Pages 89-105
Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective: The Linked-Convergent Versus Multiple-Co-ordinatively Compound Distinctions....Pages 107-128
The Linked-Convergent DistinctionβRefining the Criterion....Pages 129-171
Argument Structure and Enthymemes....Pages 173-195
From Analysis to Evaluation....Pages 197-204
Back Matter....Pages 205-211
β¦ Subjects
Logic; Philosophy of Language
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p><p>This monograph presents a method of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the standard circle and arrow approach with the Toulmin model. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, and a
The term βsubalternityβ refers to a condition of subordination brought about by colonization or other forms of economic, social, racial, linguistic, and/or cultural dominance. Subaltern studies is, therefore, a study of power. Who has it and who does not. Who is gaining it and who is losing it. Powe
<div>A discussion of current debates in cultural and subaltern studies, with a particular focus on Latin America, that offers the possibility of constituting new political practices.</div>
<p>Douglas Walton provides a systematic survey, clarification, and assessment of the different tests currently being used to carry out the tasks involved in argument identification.</p>