It was hypothesized that in a competitive interaction in which an opponent first used threats and fines a) subjects would use the highest level of coercion that could be justified by the available norms, b) subjects would be inhibited by a norm that justified using only low levels of coercion, but c
β¦ LIBER β¦
Arbitrariness of frustration: Inhibition or instigation effects on aggression
β Scribed by Brendan Gail Rule; Ronald Dyck; Andrew R. Nesdale
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1978
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 531 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Effects of norms and norm-violations on
β
Suk-Jae Lee; James T. Tedeschi
π
Article
π
1996
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 643 KB
Effects of frustration justification on
β
Jody C. Dill; Craig A. Anderson
π
Article
π
1995
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 795 KB
Effects of arbitrary provocation and aro
β
Manfred Bomewasser; AmΓ©lie Mummendey
π
Article
π
1982
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 193 KB
π 2 views
Dissociated effects of inhibition of cat
β
A. C. Matte; H. Tornow
π
Article
π
1979
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 449 KB
## Abstract The inhibitor of catecholamine synthesis at the tyrosine hydroxylase level, alphaβmethyltyrosine, administered in daily doses of 250 mg/kg IP, altered motor activity and aggressive behavior of isolated male mice in tenβminute paired encounter tests conducted on nine successive days. Mot
The inhibiting effect of chlorine or car
β
R.C. Asher; T.B.A. Kirstein
π
Article
π
1968
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 248 KB
Theoretical and experimental investigati
β
A. V. Mal'tsev
π
Article
π
1998
π
Springer
π
English
β 324 KB