𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Approaches to detecting gene × gene interaction in Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 pedigrees

✍ Scribed by Brion S. Maher; Guy N. Brock


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
91 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Whether driven by the general lack of success in finding single-gene contributions to complex disease, by increased knowledge about the potential involvement of specific biological interactions in complex disease, or by recent dramatic increases in computational power, a large number of approaches to detect locus x locus interactions were recently proposed and implemented. The six Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 (GAW14) papers summarized here each applied either existing or refined approaches with the goal of detecting gene x gene, or locus x locus, interactions in the GAW14 data. Five of six papers analyzed the simulated data; the other analyzed the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism data. The analytic strategies implemented for detecting interactions included multifactor dimensionality reduction, conditional linkage analysis, nonparametric linkage correlation, two-locus parametric linkage analysis, and a joint test of linkage and association. Overall, most of the groups found limited success in consistently detecting all of the simulated interactions due, in large part, to the nature of the generating model.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of approaches for machine-lea
✍ Alison A. Motsinger-Reif; Scott M. Dudek; Lance W. Hahn; Marylyn D. Ritchie 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 384 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The detection of genotypes that predict common, complex disease is a challenge for human geneticists. The phenomenon of epistasis, or gene‐gene interactions, is particularly problematic for traditional statistical techniques. Additionally, the explosion of genetic information makes exha

Case/pseudocontrol analysis in genetic a
✍ Heather J. Cordell; Bryan J. Barratt; David G. Clayton 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 183 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Estimation and testing of genetic effects (genotype relative risks) are often performed conditionally on parental genotypes, using data from case‐parent trios. This strategy avoids having to estimate nuisance parameters such as parental mating type frequencies, and also avoids generatin

Does accounting for gene-environment (G×
✍ Hana Selinger-Leneman; Emmanuelle Genin; Jill M. Norris; Myriam Khlat 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Despite tremendous efforts, few genes involved in the susceptibility for complex disorders have been identified. One explanation is that these disorders are a result of an interaction between genes and environment, and under such conditions, it may be difficult to measure the true genet

Using factor scores to detect G × E Inte
✍ P. C. M. Molenaar; D. I. Boomsma; D. Neeleman; C. V. Dolan; D. C. Rao; G. P. Vog 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 463 KB 👁 1 views

Moment expressions for individual factor scores can serve as simple tests for the presence of a particular class of interaction factors that are disguised as pure genetic and/or environmental factors. That is, individual genetic and environmental factor scores may be used to construct fourth-order m