This study evaluated the efficacy of adefovir (ADV) plus lamivudine (LAM) or ADV add-on therapy for patients with entecavir (ETV)-refractory hepatitis B infection. Twenty-nine ETVresistant and 8 patients with suboptimal response to ETV were enrolled. Twenty-seven patients received ADV þ LAM therapy
Antiviral efficacy of combination therapy with entecavir and adefovir for entecavir/lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus with or without adefovir resistance
✍ Scribed by Hyo-Joon Yang; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Hyo-Suk Lee
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 172 KB
- Volume
- 84
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6615
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
There is little clinical information on the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) that is resistant to multiple drugs including entecavir (ETV). The present retrospective cohort study assessed the antiviral efficacy of ETV/adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy for ETV‐resistant HBV with prior lamivudine (LAM) resistance, and either with or without previous ADV resistance. The cumulative probability of achieving a virological response (undetectable serum HBV DNA) was compared by Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Breslow method. Seventeen patients with ETV‐resistant HBV who were treated with ETV/ADV combination therapy for at least 6 months at a tertiary care center, were included; seven had dual resistance to ETV and LAM [ADV‐r(−) group] and 10 had triple resistance to ETV, LAM, and ADV [ADV‐r(+) group]. The median follow‐up period was 9 months (range, 6–23). A virological response was noted in seven patients after a median of 3 months (range, 3–12) of treatment; five in the ADV‐r(−) group and two in the ADV‐r(+) group. The cumulative probability of a virological response was significantly higher in the ADV‐r(−) group than in the ADV‐r(+) group (6 months cumulative probability, 57.1% vs. 11.1%). In conclusion, ETV/ADV combination therapy led to virological responses in five of seven patients with resistance to ETV and LAM, but a significantly poorer response in patients with prior ADV resistance than in those without prior ADV resistance. Therefore, ETV/ADV combination therapy could be a useful therapeutic option for ETV‐ and LAM‐resistant HBV without prior ADV resistance. J. Med. Virol. 84:424–430, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Entecavir (ETV) is currently recommended as a rescue therapy purely for adefovir (ADV)resistant chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. We evaluated the efficacy of ETV in patients who were resistant to lamivudine (LAM)/ADV sequential therapy and in those resistant to LAM monotherapy. Fifty LAM/
## Abstract No study has reported on the comparative effect of adefovir (ADV) add‐on lamivudine (LAM) versus switching to entecavir (ETV) in LAM‐resistant patients with chronic hepatitis B. From October 2007 to September 2008, 92 consecutive LAM‐resistant patients were enrolled (47 LAM + ADV and 45
## Abstract The aims of this study were to assess the long‐term efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B resistant to LAM, to identify predictive factors of complete viral response (HBV‐DNA <2.6 log copies/ml at 12 months of
## Abstract This was an exploratory study to investigate lamivudine‐resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) strains in selected lamivudine‐naïve HBV carriers with and without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co‐infection in South African patients. Thirty‐five lamivudine‐naïve HBV infected patients with