Antimicrobial testing for surface-immobilized agents with a surface-separated live–dead staining method
✍ Scribed by John-Bruce D. Green; Susan Bickner; Phillip W. Carter; Timothy Fulghum; Michelle Luebke; Mark A. Nordhaus; Steve Strathmann
- Book ID
- 102763203
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 952 KB
- Volume
- 108
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-3592
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Modification of a traditional live–dead staining technique based on fluorescence microscopy has yielded an improved method capable of differentiating surface‐immobilized antimicrobial agents from those agents acting via solution diffusion processes. By utilizing an inoculation chamber comprised of 50 µm polystyrene spheres as spacers between test substrate and coverslip control surfaces, three distinct bacterial cell populations can be probed by fluorescence microscopy for antimicrobial activity: (1) cells adhered to the coverslip, (2) cells adhered to the substrate, and (3) mobile cells in solution. Truly immobilized antimicrobial agents were found efficacious only at the substrate surface, while elutable agents were effective against all three populations. Glass surfaces derivatized with either quaternized poly dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate (pDMAEMA) or 3‐(trimethoxysilyl) propyldimethyloctadecyl ammonium chloride (Si‐QAC) were compared with bare glass control surfaces after contact and 4 h incubation with Staphylococcus aureus. pDMAEMA surfaces were both antimicrobial and immobilized, whereas the Si‐QAC surfaces were only observed to be antimicrobial via active diffusion. In contrast to conventional thinking, Si‐QAC surfaces showed no kill after removing all Si‐QAC elutables via rinsing procedures. The semi‐quantitative surface‐separated live–dead staining (SSLDS) technique provides mechanistic insight and represents a significant improvement relative to current microbiological test methods for evaluating immobilized, antimicrobial agents. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:231–236. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.