✦ LIBER ✦

Anticipating decision makers' attitudes: A methodological suggestion

✍ Scribed by Mihai C. Botez

Book ID: 116070356
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1981
Tongue: English
Weight: 509 KB
Volume: 19
Category: Article
ISSN: 0040-1625
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(81)90058-5

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Developing a scale for assessing risk at

Developing a scale for assessing risk attitudes of agricultural decision makers

✍ Sharon K. Bard; Peter J. Barry 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 118 KB

Surrogate decision makers’ attitudes tow

Surrogate decision makers’ attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients

✍ Barrett, Kali A.; Ferguson, Niall D.; Athaide, Valerie; Cook, Deborah J.; Friedr 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 487 KB

Decision-makers’ attitudes towards econo

Decision-makers’ attitudes towards economic valuation – a case study of German water management authorities

✍ Dehnhardt, Alexandra 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Informa UK (Taylor & Francis) 🌐 English ⚖ 254 KB

Science communication and vernal pool co

Science communication and vernal pool conservation: A study of local decision maker attitudes in a knowledge-action system

✍ Bridie McGreavy; Thomas Webler; Aram J.K. Calhoun 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 202 KB

The interactive effect of budgetary part

The interactive effect of budgetary participation and budget favorability on attitudes toward budgetary decision makers: A research note

✍ Nace Magner; Robert B. Welker; Terry L. Campbell 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 708 KB

The bi-polar resource-allocation problem

The bi-polar resource-allocation problem under uncertainty and conflict: A general methodology for the public decision-maker

✍ M Ridgley; C.A Lumpkin 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 195 KB

This paper presents a general methodology for bi-polar allocation of a scarce resource under uncertainty and conflict. Conflict is represented by competing objectives, while uncertainty accrues due to imprecision in the estimation and prediction of resource-allocation consequences, to disagreement a