Anthropological perspectives on aggression: Sex differences and cultural variation
β Scribed by Douglas P. Fry
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 56 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0096-140X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The purpose of this special issue of Aggressive Behavior is to present various topics and perspectives on the anthropology of aggression and conflict. First, a brief introduction to the articles in this issue is provided. Second, anthropological findings on sex differences in aggression are considered. The cross-cultural pattern is for males to engage in more frequent and more severe physical aggression than females. These observed sex differences are in accordance with the evolutionary concepts of sexual selection and parental investment. Simultaneously, it is clear that a host of proximate cultural influences also affects levels and styles of aggression in both females and males. Anthropological findings related to the indirect aggression concept also are discussed and tentatively related to gender. In the third section of this article, the nature and ramifications of the tremendous cross-cultural variation in aggression are explored. It is clear that nonviolent cultures exist, as do a range of more violent ones. It is also clear, as illustrated in several examples, that aggressive cultures can become dramatically more peaceful, and vice versa. Aggression can be viewed within the broader frame of conflict management; most cultures, in fact, use a variety of mechanisms for dealing with conflict that do not involve aggression. In addition, consideration is given to intracultural variability in aggression, the multidimensionality of aggression, cultural meaning (beliefs) and aggression, and the controversy over actor-based (emic) vs. observer-based (etic) interpretations of aggression. Aggr.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This tension between the value of acknowledging multiple ways of knowing versus forging common agreement about norms or standards of reasoning is a major issue raised, but not resolved, in the book. Others include the following: How do we identify a mode of reasoning? Are these modes distinct and ex