✦ LIBER ✦

Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors’ experiences

✍ Scribed by Caren Jordan; Cynthia D Belar; R.Stan Williams

Book ID: 119419069
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2002
Tongue: English
Weight: 19 KB
Volume: 78
Category: Article
ISSN: 1556-5653
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03456-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up q

Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up questionnaire

✍ Matthew Partrick; Allison L Smith; William R Meyer; Robert A Bashford 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB

Navigating conflict of interest in oocyt

Navigating conflict of interest in oocyte donation: an analysis of donors’ experiences

✍ Andrea L Kalfoglou; Gail Geller 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 172 KB

A follow-up study with oocyte donors exp

A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation

✍ Andrea L Kalfoglou; Gail Geller 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 76 KB

A retrospective analysis of shared oocyt

A retrospective analysis of shared oocyte donation from the IVF donor perspective

✍ N.M. Giannios; H. Gibbons; S.N. Covington; G. Felperin; K. Landen; S. Kingsberg 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 39 KB

A Retrospective Analysis of Pregnancy Ou

A Retrospective Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes in Recipients of Anonymously Donated Oocytes at a Large ART Center

✍ B. Berger; J.A. Phillips 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 59 KB

Motivation, attitudes and experience of

Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment

✍ Dorothy Fielding; Sarah Handley; Lindsay Duqueno; Sue Weaver; Steve Lui 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 158 KB

This paper reports a follow-up of 39 women who had donated eggs to an assisted conception unit. Their experience of donation and their motivation and attitudes were assessed. Comparisons were made with a group of semen donors who were attending a second unit. Female and male donors donated for altru