Anodic stripping voltammetric analysis of selenium: Comparison of electrode geometries
β Scribed by Michele E. Hrehocik; Jeffrey S. Lundgren; Walter J. Bowyer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 524 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1040-0397
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Gold macrodisk, microdisk, and microband electrodes are compared for the anodic stripping voltammetry of Se(IV>. All of these electrodes show a stripping peak at 0.79 V with a width at half height of 80-90 mV. The linear dynamic range, limit of detection, sensitivity, and precision are compared when using the three electrodes. Although flux at the microelectrodes is greater than at the macroelectrode, the limit of detection is similar for all three geometries. The linear dynamic range is smallest when using the microdisk electrode. The precision of the peak current is best with the macrodisk electrode. Although microelectrodes enjoy many advantages in analyses based on reversible systems, these advantages are not always realized with irreversible systems.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Surface modification of a polymeric carbon composite electrode with various mercuric precursors for the anodic stripping voltammetric analysis of heavy metals has been studied. Several microliters of the solution or suspensions of mercuric compounds such as HgCl 2 , HgO or Hg 2 Cl 2 in cyclohexanone