The Committee on Science and the Arts held ~3 meetings during the year I9O3, at which 62 cases were considered, of which 47 were finally passed upon. These figures, although indicating a fair amount of work, do not adequately represent the frill extent of the Committee's activity, since no less than three meetings were, practically, wholly devoted to the consideration of two important (and still pending) eases.
It is proper to mention, also, that, while the number of cases disposed of by reports is somewhat less than in I9O2 , a satisfaelory explanation for this may be found iu the fact that a considerable number of pending eases are of more than ordinary interest and importance, and have demanded a large share of time and care in their consideration.
The number of unfinished cases still in the Committee's hands is 42. Each month new subjects are being entered on the Committee's Record Book, and the work in hand and in prospect is ample enough to keep the members fully occupied.
A difference between the Committee and the Trustees of the Elliott Cresson Medal Fund, which made its appearance Several years ago, reached an acute stage during the past year by reason of the refusal of the Trustees to honor the request of the Treasurer of the Institute for a medal awarded in a certain case by this Committee acting for the Institute. The Trustees have taken the ground that they have the right to set aside an award of the Elliott Cresson Medal, where, in their opinion, it is not properly made. In other words, they claim (aud in the particular case above-named have exercised) authority to revise and pass judgment on the acts of the Institute, a claim which this Committee cannot admit.
The facts of the case were reported to the Board of Managers, which, with unanimity, supported the Committee. The question at issue is fundamental in its bearing in the relations of the Trustees to the Institute. It will presently be adjudicated in court.
Respectfully yours, C. E. RONALDSON, C/zairma~t Commitlee o~z ScieTlce and the Arls.