๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Animalism versus Lockeanism: Reply to Mackie

โœ Scribed by Harold W. Noonan


Book ID
110743089
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
97 KB
Volume
51
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-8094

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Reply to Mr MacKie
โœ Robert S. Summers ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1982 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 620 KB
Causes and enablers: A reply to Mackie
โœ Lawrence Brian Lombard ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 221 KB

In "Causing, Enabling, and Counter[actual Dependence", 1 Penelope Mackie argues that the concept of an enabler, which I employed in "Causes, Enablers, and the Counter[actual Analysis", 2 fails to pick out a group of events which are not causes of the events which counterfactually depend on them. In

Reply to an objection to animal rights
โœ Joseph S. Fulda ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 80 KB

Suppose we grant the claim of many philosophers that-animals have fights. Suppose further that animal fights are, on occasion, in conflict with human fights. Most would agree that the fights of persons trump the fights of animals: if the circumstances make some rights-violations inevitable, better t