Stability is essential to #ying and is usually assumed to be especially problematic in #apping #ight. If so, problems of stability may have presented a particular hurdle to the evolution of #apping #ight. In spite of this, the stability of #apping #ight has never been properly analysed. Here we use
Animal Flight Dynamics I. Stability in Gliding Flight
β Scribed by ADRIAN L.R. THOMAS; GRAHAM K. TAYLOR
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 575 KB
- Volume
- 212
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5193
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Stability is as essential to #ying as lift itself, but previous discussions of how #ying animals maintain stability have been limited in both number and scope. By developing the pitching moment equations for gliding animals and by discussing potential sources of roll and yaw stability, we consider the various sources of static stability used by gliding animals. We "nd that gliding animals di!er markedly from aircraft in how they maintain stability. In particular, the pendulum stability provided when the centre of gravity lies below the wings is a much more important source of stability in #ying animals than in most conventional aircraft. Drag-based stability also appears to be important for many gliding animals, whereas in aircraft, drag is usually kept to a minimum. One unexpected consequence of these di!erences is that the golden measure of static pitching stability in aircraft*the static margin*can only strictly be applied to #ying animals if the equilibrium angle of attack is speci"ed. We also derive several rules of thumb by which stable #iers can be identi"ed. Stable #iers are expected to exhibit one or more of the following features: (1) Wings that are swept forward in slow #ight. (2) Wings that are twisted down at the tips when swept back (wash-out) and twisted up at the tips when swept forwards (wash-in). (3) Additional lifting surfaces (canard, hindwings or a tail) inclined nose-up to the main wing if they lie forward of it, and nose-down if they lie behind it (longitudinal dihedral). Each of these predictions is directional*the opposite is expected to apply in unstable animals. In addition, animals with reduced stability are expected to display direct #ight patterns in turbulent conditions, in contrast to the erratic #ight patterns predicted for stable animals, in which large restoring forces are generated. Using these predictions, we "nd that #ying animals possess a far higher degree of inherent stability than has generally been recognized. This conclusion is reinforced by measurements of the relative positions of the centres of gravity and lift in birds, which suggest that the wings alone may be su$cient to provide longitudinal static stability. Birds may therefore resemble tailless aircraft more closely than conventional aircraft with a tailplane.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Wings carry tiny insects, fluttering butterflies, and backyard birds, and they even once propelled some dinosaurs up and through the skies. Find out how, when, and why birds and beasts have taken to the air, and discover how wings work in this informative and brilliantly illustrated book about fligh