Angiographic and clinical outcomes after rescue coronary stenting

✍ Scribed by Harold L. Dauerman; Ross Prpic; Costa Andreou; Mary A. Vu; Jeffrey J. Popma

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2000
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 66 KB
• Volume: 50
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1522-1946
• DOI: 10.1002/1522-726x(200007)50:3<269::aid-ccd1>3.0.co;2-k

✦ Synopsis

The role of coronary stenting in improving outcomes after failed thrombolysis has not been well described. This study represents a registry of rescue coronary interventions performed during a 3 year period in which interventional treatment was changing for this high risk population. We analyzed acute angiographic results and clinical outcomes in 108 consecutive patients treated for thrombolytic failure with either balloon angioplasty (n ‫؍‬ 63) or coronary stenting (n ‫؍‬ 45). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 5.5%, and there was no increase in complications in the stent group. Coronary stenting was associated with improved angiographic results including lower residual stenosis in the culprit artery (15 ؎ 10% vs. 31 ؎ 22%, P < 0.001) without increasing bleeding complications. The rate of in-hospital and long term target vessel revascularization in the stent group was significantly lower than in the unmatched PTCA group. Rescue coronary stenting is safe, improves acute angiographic results compared to PTCA alone and leads to excellent in-hospital and long term outcomes.