𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Anencephaly and spina bifida among Hispanics: Maternal, sociodemographic, and acculturation factors in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study

✍ Scribed by Mark A. Canfield; Tunu A. Ramadhani; Gary M. Shaw; Suzan L. Carmichael; D. Kim Waller; Bridget S. Mosley; Marjorie H. Royle; Richard S. Olney


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
113 KB
Volume
85
Category
Article
ISSN
1542-0752

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND: We used data from the multisite National Birth Defects Prevention Study for expected delivery dates from October 1997 through 2003, to determine whether the increased risk in anencephaly and spina bifida (neural tube defects (NTDs)) in Hispanics was explained by selected sociodemographic, acculturation, and other maternal characteristics. METHODS: For each type of defect, we examined the association with selected maternal characteristics stratified by race/ethnicity and the association with Hispanic parents' acculturation level, relative to non‐Hispanic whites. We used logistic regression and calculated crude odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Hispanic mothers who reported the highest level of income were 80% less likely to deliver babies with spina bifida. In addition, highly educated Hispanic and white mothers had 76 and 35% lower risk, respectively. Other factors showing differing effects for spina bifida in Hispanics included maternal age, parity, and gestational diabetes. For spina bifida there was no significant elevated risk for U.S.–born Hispanics, relative to whites, but for anencephaly, corresponding ORs ranged from 1.9 to 2.3. The highest risk for spina bifida was observed for recent Hispanic immigrant parents from Mexico or Central America residing in the United States <5 years (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.46–7.37). CONCLUSIONS: Less acculturated Hispanic parents seemed to be at highest risk of NTDs. For anencephaly, U.S.–born and English‐speaking Hispanic parents were also at increased risk. Finally, from an etiologic standpoint, spina bifida and anencephaly appeared to be etiologically heterogeneous from these analyses. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2009. Β© 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Maternal caffeine intake and risk of sel
✍ Marilyn L. Browne; Adrienne T. Hoyt; Marcia L. Feldkamp; Sonja A. Rasmussen; Eli πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 109 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

BACKGROUND: Caffeine intake is common during pregnancy, yet few epidemiologic studies have examined the association between maternal caffeine consumption and birth defects. Using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), we examined the association between maternal caffeine cons

Maternal thyroid disease, thyroid medica
✍ Marilyn L. Browne; Sonja A. Rasmussen; Adrienne T. Hoyt; D. Kim Waller; Charlott πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 101 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract **BACKGROUND:** Although thyroid disorders are present in approximately 3% of pregnant women, little is known about the association between maternal thyroid disease and birth defects. **METHODS:** We assessed the association between maternal thyroid disease, thyroid medication use, and

Maternal occupational pesticide exposure
✍ Carissa M. Rocheleau; Paul A. Romitti; Wayne T. Sanderson; Lixian Sun; Christina πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 117 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## **BACKGROUND** Hypospadias is a common congenital malformation among men in which the urethral opening is ventrally displaced. Pesticide exposure has been suggested as a possible etiologic factor, but previous epidemiologic studies have produced inconsistent results. ## **METHODS**

Prevalence of self-reported infection du
✍ Sarah A. Collier; Sonja A. Rasmussen; Marcia L. Feldkamp; Margaret A. Honein πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 112 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: Although specific maternal infections during pregnancy have been associated with birth defects and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, the prevalence of infections during pregnancy has not been well described. ## METHODS: We estimated the prevalence of self‐reported infe