✦ LIBER ✦

Anchors, endorsements, and preferences: A field experiment

✍ Scribed by Felix Schläpfer; Marcel Schmitt

Book ID: 116859821
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 663 KB
Volume: 29
Category: Article
ISSN: 0928-7655
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.01.001

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Ethnic Preferences in Internet Dating: A

Ethnic Preferences in Internet Dating: A Field Experiment

✍ Jakobsson, Niklas; Lindholm, Henrik 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Haworth Press Inc 🌐 English ⚖ 570 KB

Sorting, incentives and risk preferences

Sorting, incentives and risk preferences: Evidence from a field experiment

✍ Charles Bellemare; Bruce Shearer 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 155 KB

Risk and time preferences of entrepreneu

Risk and time preferences of entrepreneurs: evidence from a Danish field experiment

✍ Andersen, Steffen; Di Girolamo, Amalia; Harrison, Glenn W.; Lau, Morten I. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 232 KB

Access to party positions and preference

Access to party positions and preference formation: a field experiment

✍ Felix Schläpfer 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Swiss Political Science Association 🌐 German ⚖ 161 KB

Time preference before and after a risky

Time preference before and after a risky activity – A field experiment

✍ Shavit, Tal; Rosenboim, Mosi; Shani, Yaniv 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 298 KB

Hypothetical versus real preferences: re

Hypothetical versus real preferences: results from an opportunistic field experiment

✍ Stirling Bryan; Sue Jowett 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB

## Abstract Over recent years there has been renewed interest in cost‐benefit analysis (CBA) in health care but the ‘hypothetical bias’ concern (i.e. the belief that WTP values overstate real preferences) is a remaining anxiety. This paper reports new empirical data comparing hypothetical and real