๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Analyzing fixed-event forecast revisions

โœ Scribed by Chang, Chia-Lin; de Bruijn, Bert; Franses, Philip Hans; McAleer, Michael


Book ID
122921462
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2013
Tongue
English
Weight
481 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0169-2070

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Forecast Revisions
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 38 KB
Robust evaluation of fixed-event forecas
โœ Michael P. Clements; Nick Taylor ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 124 KB

## Abstract In this paper we introduce a new testing procedure for evaluating the rationality of fixedโ€event forecasts based on a pseudoโ€maximum likelihood estimator. The procedure is designed to be robust to departures in the normality assumption. A model is introduced to show that such departures

Algorithms for explaining forecast revis
โœ Richard M. Todd ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 782 KB

Forecasts are routinely revised, and these revisions are often the subject of informal analysis and discussion. This paper argues (1) that forecast revisions are analyzed because they help forecasters and forecast users to evaluate forecasts and forecasting procedures and (2) that these analyses can

Evaluating the Rationality of Fixed-even
โœ MICHAEL P. CLEMENTS ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 211 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

A test of forecast rationality based on the weak eciency of ยฎxed-event forecasts was proposed by Nordhaus (1987). This paper considers the scope for pooling ยฎxed-event forecasts across `events', to deliver more powerful tests of the weak-eciency hypothesis, when only a small number of ยฎxedevent fore